Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Premium2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs. Michelin CrossClimate SUV
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Kumho (65%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate SUV has a better rating of 80% compared to 64% of the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S. The first tyre test of Kumho HA32 Solus 4S was done in 2020, compared to 2018 when was the Michelin CrossClimate SUV first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Kumho HA32 Solus 4S dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Michelin CrossClimate SUV also have B wet ratings. We also know where HA32 Solus 4S is made - China.
| # | Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
| Michelin CrossClimate SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R16 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 10.78
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Exemplary2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
