Segment
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle2. Kleber Quadraxer 2 Upper-middle3. Nokian Seasonproof Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs. Kleber Quadraxer 2 vs. Nokian Seasonproof
The tyres under consideration are the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S a product of Kumho Tyres, rated at 67% and the Kleber Quadraxer 2 a product of Kleber Tyres, rated a notch down at 5%. The Kleber Quadraxer 2 has now been replaced by the newer model, Kleber Quadraxer 3, upgrading the earlier model.
Comparing the two products, starting with the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S, an all-round tyre manufactured in China, this tyre achieves positive reviews for its exterior noise, mileage, and price to performance ratio. But the tire falls short in some areas which incluces low mileage and high rolling resistance.
Moving on to the Kleber Quadraxer 2 originally from Poland, this all-round tyre shines in areas like exterior noise, snow braking, snow cornering, snow handling, and snow traction. However, its performance reserves in curve aquaplaning are cited as limited. The Quadraxer 2 also boasts strong performance on packed snow surfaces, short dry braking distances, low rolling noise, good mileage and economy, and a competitive price.
Test results indicate the Champion in Snow category to the Quadraxer 2. It ranked 14th position while the HA32 Solus 4S placed 10th in a total competition of 32 tyres, according to systems like Autobild and autobild 2020.
In conclusion, while the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S stands out in exterior noise, mileage, and price to value features, it might disappoint in mileage and roller resistance. On the other hand, the Kleber Quadraxer 2 excels in numerous features, notably in categories like exterior noise and snow performance, only falling short of expectations in curve aquaplaning performances. Such performance characteristics must be carefully considered when making a choice between the two tyres.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 10.783. Kleber Quadraxer 2 12.63
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory3. Nokian Seasonproof Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory3. Nokian Seasonproof Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 41,5 | 54,4 | |||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 2 | 42,6 | 55,8 | |||||
| Nokian Seasonproof | 41,4 | 53,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2 | 2+ | 3 | |||
| Kleber Quadraxer 2 Rating: Good | 2- | 2 | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 44,3 | 49,3 | |||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 2 | 43,2 | 51,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
