Segment
2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Premium3. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle4. Kleber Quadraxer 2 Upper-middle5. Nokian Seasonproof Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 2 vs. Nokian Seasonproof
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
4. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 10.785. Kleber Quadraxer 2 12.63
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Exemplary2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Test winner4. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory5. Nokian Seasonproof Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
4. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory5. Nokian Seasonproof Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 41.4 | 49.8 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 | 40.4 | 45.4 | |||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 | 37.7 | 47 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
