Segment
2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Premium3. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 10.78
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Exemplary2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Test winner3. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
3. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 41.4 | 49.8 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 | 40.4 | 45.4 | |||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 | 37.7 | 47 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
