• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs. Continental AllSeasonContact

Mutual tests overview

Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results

Tests used in comparison (4)

Organization Season Year Dimension Action
Autobild Autobild
All season
2022 195/55 R16 View
Autobild Autobild
All season
2021 225/50 R17 View
Autobild Autobild
All season
2021 215/60 R16 View
Autobild Autobild
All season
2020 205/55 R16 View

Today, we compare and contrast two popular tyres, the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S and the Continental AllSeasonContact, to see which one might be the better choice based on several different tests conducted over the past couple of years.


The Kumho HA32 Solus 4S, manufactured in China, has an overall rating of 73%. It performed best in the Auto Bild tests in areas such as snow braking, mileage, and price to value ratio. Longitudinal aquaplaning and exterior noise were also among its top features. However, the tyre's performance showed some weaknesses in areas like dry and wet braking, and snow grip, leading to its 10th place finish in a field of 32 tyres.


On the other hand, the Continental AllSeasonContact, manufactured in Slovakia, Czech Republic and France, achieved an overall rating of 76%. This all-rounder excelled in areas such as snow braking, snow cornering, and wet circle cornering. It also earned praise for its comfort and snow handling, taking the 8th place in the same test. However, its performance on dry surfaces and its durability were seen as downsides.


In terms of mutual test positions, the Continental tyre did manage to beat the Kumho model. Yet, both are still well within the top one-third of all tyres tested, indicating that they are quite comparable in performance.


The Kumho tyre is praised for its traction and braking on snow, high mileage, and good economy. Yet, it is marked down for slightly prolonged wet and dry braking distances and mediocre aquaplaning reserves.


Meanwhile, the Continental tyre is recognised for its top winter capabilities, stable wet handling, and low rolling resistance. Yet, it falls a bit short due to understeering behaviour and prolonged braking distances on dry roads, and a perceived lack of durability and economy.


To summarise, while the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S has its advantages, especially in terms of price and mileage, the Continental AllSeasonContact comes out slightly ahead overall, particularly for drivers who often face winter conditions. This is reflected in both the test results and our overall ratings. However, each tyre's performance can also be influenced by factors like the specific vehicle model and individual driving styles. Therefore, we recommend further exploring the Kumho and Continental tyres to find the best match for your needs.


Currently, neither of the tyres has been superseded by a newer model.


Note: Always consider the dates of the test results, as manufacturers often improve their tyres over time.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 4 tests

Wet Performance
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
67%
Kumho
HA32 Solus 4S
Continental AllSeasonContact
75%
Continental
AllSeasonContact
Wet Braking
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
61%
Continental AllSeasonContact
75%
Wet Handling
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
67%
Continental AllSeasonContact
73%
Wet Circle Cornering
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
69%
Continental AllSeasonContact
81%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
72%
Continental AllSeasonContact
73%
Best: Kumho HA32 Solus 4S (100.0%)
Aquaplaning Cross
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
66%
Continental AllSeasonContact
74%
Best: Toyo Celsius AS2 (96.0%)
Best in category: Vredestein Quatrac 5 (93.6%)
Dry Performance
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
69%
Kumho
HA32 Solus 4S
Continental AllSeasonContact
67%
Continental
AllSeasonContact
Dry Braking
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
64%
Continental AllSeasonContact
60%
Dry Handling
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
73%
Continental AllSeasonContact
73%
Best in category: Michelin CrossClimate 2 (89.8%)
Snow Performance
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
69%
Kumho
HA32 Solus 4S
Continental AllSeasonContact
90%
Continental
AllSeasonContact
Snow Braking
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
81%
Continental AllSeasonContact
91%
Best: Kleber Quadraxer 2 (96.0%)
Snow Traction
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
69%
Continental AllSeasonContact
87%
Snow Handling
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
68%
Continental AllSeasonContact
87%
Best: Kleber Quadraxer 2 (96.0%)
Snow Circle Cornering
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
59%
Continental AllSeasonContact
95%
Best: Kleber Quadraxer 2 (96.0%)
Best in category: Kleber Quadraxer 2 (96.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
73%
Kumho
HA32 Solus 4S
Continental AllSeasonContact
73%
Continental
AllSeasonContact
Noise Exterior
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
78%
Continental AllSeasonContact
76%
Best: Nokian Seasonproof (88.7%)
Ride Comfort
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
68%
Continental AllSeasonContact
69%
Best: Kleber Quadraxer 3 (91.0%)
Best in category: Vredestein Quatrac Pro (86.0%)
Economy
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
65%
Kumho
HA32 Solus 4S
Continental AllSeasonContact
75%
Continental
AllSeasonContact
Rolling Resistance
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
59%
Continental AllSeasonContact
84%
Mileage
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
70%
Continental AllSeasonContact
65%
Best: Vredestein Quatrac 5 (100.0%)
Best in category: Michelin CrossClimate+ (94.0%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison