Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Upper-middle3. Nokian Powerproof 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs. Nokian Powerproof 2
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Test winner2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Very good3. Nokian Powerproof 2 Recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Recommended3. Nokian Powerproof 2 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.8 | 25.2 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) | 34.4 | 27.1 | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 5 | 34.4 | 27.7 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof 2 | 34.4 | 28.1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Rating: Very good | |||||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
