Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Upper-middle2. Linglong Sport Master Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Linglong (43%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) has a better rating of 78% compared to 72% of the Linglong Sport Master. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) was done in 2025, compared to 2023 when was the Linglong Sport Master first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2026 245/45 R19 test, where both the Ecsta Sport (PS72) and the Sport Master were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
| Linglong Sport Master
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Upper-middle2. Linglong Sport Master Lowcost
1. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Very good2. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory
1. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Recommended2. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.8 | 25.2 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) | 34.4 | 27.1 | |||||
| Linglong Sport Master | 33.9 | 25.2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 141 | 68 | 55 | 23 | 16 | 7 | |
| Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Rating: Recommended | 131 | 62 | 49 | 20 | 15 | 5 | |
| Linglong Sport Master Rating: Recommended | 129 | 68 | 44 | 17 | 11 | 6 | |
| Show test details | |||||||