Segment
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Upper-middle
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Kumho (58%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 has a better rating of 80% compared to 78% of the Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72). The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) was done in 2025, compared to 2019 when was the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Die Reifentester 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Ecsta Sport (PS72) and the Ventus S1 evo3 K127 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (86%) of the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Upper-middle
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Very good
1. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Recommended2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Rating: Very good | |||||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||