Segment
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than Kumho (56%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) has a better rating of 90% compared to 82% of the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) was done in 2025, compared to 2019 when was the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Die Reifentester 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Ecsta Sport (PS72) and the Ventus S1 evo3 K127 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 86% of Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (87%) of the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Very good
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Rating: Very good | |||||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
