Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium2. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Premium3. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Upper-middle4. Nokian Powerproof 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs. Nokian Powerproof 2
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Test winner2. Continental PremiumContact 7 Test winner3. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Very good4. Nokian Powerproof 2 Recommended
Worst rating in test
3. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Recommended4. Nokian Powerproof 2 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry lane changing
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.8 | 25.2 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) | 34.4 | 27.1 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 7 | 34.3 | 27.3 | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 5 | 34.4 | 27.7 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof 2 | 34.4 | 28.1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
