Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Continental PremiumContact 6
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Kumho (58%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) has a better rating of 87% compared to 76% of the Continental PremiumContact 6. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) was done in 2025, compared to 2017 when was the Continental PremiumContact 6 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (82%) of the Continental PremiumContact 6 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
| Continental PremiumContact 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Very good
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Recommended2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended
