Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Premium2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Kumho (56%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport has a better rating of 91% compared to 90% of the Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72). The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) was done in 2025, compared to 2021 when was the Bridgestone Potenza Sport first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Die Reifentester 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Ecsta Sport (PS72) and the Potenza Sport were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 88% of Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (93%) of the Bridgestone Potenza Sport also have A wet ratings.
| # | Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Very good2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Very good
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Rating: Very good | |||||||
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport Rating: Very good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
