Segment
1. Pirelli P ZERO Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle3. Nokian zLine Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Ecsta PS91 vs. Nokian zLine vs. Pirelli P ZERO vs. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 K117
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian zLine 7.383. Pirelli P ZERO 6.06
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Pirelli P ZERO Highly recommended2. Nokian zLine Recommended3. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Pirelli P ZERO Good2. Nokian zLine Recommended3. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet circle cornering
4. Nokian zLine 60%
Wet handling
2. Nokian zLine 85%
Aquaplaning - cross
2. Nokian zLine 75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Nokian zLine 83%
Wet braking
1. Nokian zLine 90%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
2. Nokian zLine 93%
Dry braking
3. Nokian zLine 85%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Nokian zLine 75%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Nokian zLine 90%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,3 | 6 | 7,6 | 7 | |||
| Kumho Ecsta PS91 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,5 | 6 | 8,8 | 7,3 | |||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Recommended | 8,2 | 8,4 | 8 | 8,4 | |||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Highly recommended | 9,3 | 9,2 | 9,7 | 7,7 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
