Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle2. Nokian zLine Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Ecsta PS91 vs. Nokian zLine vs. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 K117
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian zLine 7.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
2. Nokian zLine 75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Nokian zLine 83%
Wet braking
1. Nokian zLine 90%
Wet circle cornering
3. Nokian zLine 60%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Nokian zLine 85%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Nokian zLine 90%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,3 | 6 | 7,6 | 7 | |||
| Kumho Ecsta PS91 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,5 | 6 | 8,8 | 7,3 | |||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Recommended | 8,2 | 8,4 | 8 | 8,4 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
