Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle2. Nokian zLine Upper-middle3. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Lowcost
Comparison: Kumho Ecsta PS91 vs. Nokian zLine vs. Barum Bravuris 5 HM
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian zLine 7.383. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 26.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Nokian zLine Recommended3. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Conditionally recommended3. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
1. Nokian zLine 90%
Wet handling
1. Nokian zLine 85%
Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian zLine 75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian zLine 83%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
1. Nokian zLine 85%
Dry handling
1. Nokian zLine 93%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Nokian zLine 75%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Nokian zLine 90%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,3 | 6 | 7,6 | 7 | |||
| Kumho Ecsta PS91 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,5 | 6 | 8,8 | 7,3 | |||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Recommended | 8,2 | 8,4 | 8 | 8,4 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
