Segment
1. Pirelli P ZERO Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle3. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle4. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Upper-middle5. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle6. Nokian zLine Upper-middle7. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Lowcost
1. Pirelli P ZERO Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle3. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle4. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Upper-middle5. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle6. Nokian zLine Upper-middle7. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Lowcost
3. Nokian zLine 20.
2. Pirelli P ZERO 6.063. Nokian zLine 7.385. Nokian Powerproof 7.457. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 26.38
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary3. Pirelli P ZERO Highly recommended5. Nokian zLine Recommended6. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory7. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Satisfactory
1. Pirelli P ZERO Good2. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended3. Nokian zLine Recommended4. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory5. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended6. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Conditionally recommended7. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Conditionally recommended
1. Nokian zLine 83%
1. Nokian zLine 90%
6. Nokian zLine 60%
3. Nokian zLine 85%
1. Nokian zLine 75%
3. Nokian zLine 85%
2. Nokian zLine 93%
1. Nokian zLine 75%
1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB
1. Nokian zLine 90%
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS91 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Recommended | 2+ | 2 | |||||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2+ | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||