Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle2. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle3. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Upper-middle4. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle5. Nokian zLine Upper-middle6. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Lowcost
1. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle2. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle3. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Upper-middle4. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle5. Nokian zLine Upper-middle6. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Lowcost
3. Nokian zLine 20.
2. Nokian zLine 7.384. Nokian Powerproof 7.456. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 26.38
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary4. Nokian zLine Recommended5. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory6. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Satisfactory
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended2. Nokian zLine Recommended3. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory4. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended5. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Conditionally recommended6. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Conditionally recommended
1. Nokian zLine 75%
1. Nokian zLine 83%
1. Nokian zLine 90%
5. Nokian zLine 60%
2. Nokian zLine 85%
1. Nokian zLine 93%
2. Nokian zLine 85%
1. Nokian zLine 75%
1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB
1. Nokian zLine 90%
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS91 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Recommended | 2+ | 2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||