Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Kumho (58%). Important for this comparison is also the Sportauto 2015 235/35 R19 test, where both the Ecsta PS91 and the Potenza S001 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 68% of Kumho Ecsta PS91 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (67%) of the Bridgestone Potenza S001 also have B wet ratings. We also know where Ecsta PS91 is made - Korea.
| # | Kumho Ecsta PS91
| Bridgestone Potenza S001
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R21 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Satisfactory2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Satisfactory
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Conditionally recommended2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,3 | 6 | 7,6 | 7 | |||
| Kumho Ecsta PS91 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,5 | 6 | 8,8 | 7,3 | |||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,5 | 7,6 | 7,6 | 7 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||