Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Kumho (58%). The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta PS71 was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Michelin Primacy 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2021 225/50 R17 test, where both the Ecsta PS71 and the Primacy 4 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 76% of Kumho Ecsta PS71 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (53%) of the Michelin Primacy 4 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Michelin Primacy 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R14 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended2. Michelin Primacy 4 Highly recommended
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Recommended2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
1. Michelin Primacy 4 68 dB
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | |||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Good | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,2 | 2,0 | |||
| Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,5 | 3,0 | 1,5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||