Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle2. Linglong Green-Max Lowcost
Comparison: Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Linglong Green-Max
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (56%) than Linglong (43%). The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta PS71 was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Linglong Green-Max first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Ecsta PS71 and the Green-Max were tested.
| # | Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Linglong Green-Max
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R13 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry driving behavior
Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 37,1 | 31,6 | |||||
| Linglong Green-Max | 37,7 | 33,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
