Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Kumho (58%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 has a better rating of 83% compared to 74% of the Firestone Roadhawk 2. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta PS71 was done in 2018, compared to 2024 when was the Firestone Roadhawk 2 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 76% of Kumho Ecsta PS71 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (98%) of the Firestone Roadhawk 2 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Firestone Roadhawk 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Satisfactory2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
