Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle2. Federal Evoluzion ST-1 Lowcost
| # | Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Federal Evoluzion ST-1
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R16 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Looking for a clear comparison between the Kumho Ecsta PS71 and the Federal Evoluzion ST-1? Both are summer tyres aimed at drivers who value confident handling and braking in warmer conditions, but their test records show meaningful differences. Below we summarize the key results, strengths, and weaknesses to help you choose the right set.
Kumho Ecsta PS71 is Kumho’s mainstream UHP summer option, while Federal Evoluzion ST-1 competes as a more budget-oriented ultra-high-performance tyre from Federal. For brand overviews, see the manufacturers: Kumho and Federal.
Test results and overall rankings
What the tests say about Kumho Ecsta PS71
Autobild’s 2018 notes highlight the PS71’s balanced high performance potential, good handling qualities, and short wet and dry braking distances, all at a fair price. One recurring trade-off is elevated cabin noise compared with some rivals. In aggregate results, the PS71 shows a strong, well-rounded performance profile that consistently keeps it in the upper midfield or better in big-group tests.
What the tests imply about Federal Evoluzion ST-1
With a mid-pack Autobild result (24/53) and a modest aggregate score, the ST-1 tends to trail contemporary UHP competitors in objective performance. While it can deliver acceptable grip and stability for everyday summer driving, it generally lacks the braking bite and handling sharpness demonstrated by higher-ranked tyres in this segment.
Mutual-test verdict: which tyre is better?
In the direct comparison within the same Autobild test, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 outperforms the Federal Evoluzion ST-1 (18th vs 24th of 53). Combined with the substantially higher overall rating (76% vs 36%), the PS71 emerges as the stronger, more rounded choice for drivers who want dependable wet and dry stopping distances and stable handling. The Federal Evoluzion ST-1 may still appeal to budget-focused motorists, but its results suggest noticeable compromises, particularly if you frequently drive in the rain or value crisp, confidence-inspiring responses.
Replacement status: Neither tyre currently lists an official newer successor on our platform, so there’s no replacement link to provide at this time.
Bottom line: Choose the Kumho Ecsta PS71 if you prioritize balanced performance and strong braking across conditions, and can accept a bit more cabin noise. Consider the Federal Evoluzion ST-1 only if cost is the main priority and you’re comfortable with its mid-field standing in independent tests.
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle2. Federal Evoluzion ST-1 Lowcost
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 61.7 | 26.6 | |||||
| Federal Evoluzion ST-1 | 65 | 29 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 34,9 | 29 | |||||
| Federal Evoluzion ST-1 | 35,3 | 39,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 37,1 | 31,6 | |||||
| Federal Evoluzion ST-1 | 37 | 33,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||