• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport

In this article, we will compare Kumho Ecsta PS71 and Bridgestone Potenza Sport, two superb summer tyres produced by leading manufacturers Kumho and Bridgestone. The primary purpose of this comparison is to assist potential buyers in making the best tyre selection by providing an all-encompassing review and test results analysis.


Kumho Ecsta PS71 is a high-performance summer tyre noted for its superb aquaplaning resistance, both longitudinal and cross, which resulted in securing impressive positions in multiple tests, like placing 4th out of 52 in the Autobild test and 7th out of 10 in ACE's test. However, it also shows some weaknesses, like relatively poor grip in both wet and dry conditions as noted by TyreReviews.com.


In contrast, Bridgestone Potenza Sport is an ultra-high-performance (UUHP) summer tyre, made in Poland and Hungary, that garnered remarkable scores in various comprehensive tests. It seized the first position in the Autobild tyre test out of 52 contenders, second place in the ADAC test out of 18 and fourth in ACE's out of 10, standing out in wet circle cornering, braking (in both wet and dry conditions) and dynamic handling properties. However, it might not be perfect for those seeking a quiet and comfortable ride, as it shows low aquaplaning resistance, high noise levels, and was ranked as the lowest in comfort on the TyreReviews.com test.


According to our evaluation, Kumho Ecsta PS71 scored 76%, while Bridgestone Potenza Sport achieved a higher rating of 91%. Both of these models currently have no newer tyre options that replace them. To provide a summary, these tyres have proven their strengths and weaknesses throughout various tests. While the Kumho Ecsta PS71 excels in providing aquaplaning resistance and comfort, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport offers better performance in wet and dry braking, as well as handling.


In conclusion, based on the collected test data, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport is stronger overall considering its remarkable ratings and performances. However, the final choice should depend on the individual requirements and preferences of the driver.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Kumho Ecsta PS71
84%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79%
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport
Wet Braking
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
92%
Wet Handling
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Best: Falken Ziex ZE320 (96.0%)
Wet Circle Cornering
Kumho Ecsta PS71
88%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
96%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta PS71
88%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
60%
Aquaplaning Cross
Kumho Ecsta PS71
80%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
61%
Best in category: Hankook Ventus Evo (86.0%)
Dry Performance
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
86%
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport
Dry Braking
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
96%
Dry Handling
Kumho Ecsta PS71
70%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
75%
Best: Hankook Ventus Evo (90.0%)
Best in category: Falken Ziex ZE320 (87.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Kumho Ecsta PS71
48%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
60%
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport
Noise Exterior
Kumho Ecsta PS71
48%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
60%
Best in category: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 (86.0%)
Economy
Kumho Ecsta PS71
74%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
73%
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport
Rolling Resistance
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
61%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85%
Best in category: Continental PremiumContact 7 (88.7%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison