Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Kumho (56%). In this particular case, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV has a better rating of 93% compared to 64% of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV was done in 2025, compared to 2020 when was the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 255/55 R18 test, where both the Ecsta PS71 SUV and the Pilot Sport 4 SUV were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (83%) of the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV also have A wet ratings.
# | Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R23 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV Upper-middle
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Exemplary
Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Rating: Good | 2+ | 2 | 2 | ||||
Show test details |