Comparison: Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV vs. Falken Azenis FK520
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Kumho (58%). In this particular case, the Falken Azenis FK520 has a better rating of 74% compared to 64% of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV was done in 2025, compared to 2023 when was the Falken Azenis FK520 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 255/55 R18 test, where both the Ecsta PS71 SUV and the Azenis FK520 were tested.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Tests used in comparison (1)
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Autobild
|
Summer
|
2025 | 255/55 R18 | View |
Performance comparison
Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
Falken Azenis FK520
Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
Falken Azenis FK520
Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
Falken Azenis FK520
Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
Falken Azenis FK520
Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
Falken Azenis FK520
Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
Falken Azenis FK520
Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
Falken Azenis FK520
Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
Falken Azenis FK520
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
