• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin Primacy 4

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Kumho (56%). In this particular case, the Michelin Primacy 4 has a better rating of 82% compared to 73% of the Kumho Ecsta HS52. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta HS52 was done in 2022, compared to 2019 when was the Michelin Primacy 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Ecsta HS52 and the Primacy 4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 77% of Kumho Ecsta HS52 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (63%) of the Michelin Primacy 4 also have A wet ratings.

# Kumho Ecsta HS52
/73%
Michelin Primacy 4
/82%

Add to comparison

Kumho
Michelin
DimensionsR14 - R18 R15 - R20
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name WetDryRunning costs
Best values in test12+1+
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Rating: Good
222
Michelin Primacy 4
Rating: Exemplary
21-1-
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test35,727,5
Kumho Ecsta HS5235,7 28,6
Michelin Primacy 436,229,3
Show test details