Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle2. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Lowcost
| # | Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Maxxis Premitra HP5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In the comparison between the Kumho Ecsta HS52 and the Maxxis Premitra HP5, both summer tyres produced by Kumho and Maxxis respectively, we have compiled data from several tests and reviews to help users make the best choice.
The Kumho Ecsta HS52, which is a direct successor to the highly-rated Kumho Ecsta HS51, scores an impressive 73% in our ratings versus 56% by its competitor, the Maxxis Premitra HP5. Moreover, the HS52's performance in the Autobild test where it finished third out of 51 tyres further endorses its supremacy.
On the road, HS52's pronounced strengths are dry handling, dry braking, and wet braking. Its ability to offer compelling performance on both wet and dry surfaces, together with a superb braking efficiency is noteworthy. However, a slight setback might be an average ride comfort. Moreover, some users have reported a slight delay in steering response. Overall, it offers good value for money, especially considering its performance credentials.
On the contrary, the Maxxis Premitra HP5 ranks 16th in the same Autobild test. Yet, the tyre fares well in aquaplaning scenarios - both cross and longitudinal, providing excellent safety features. The Premitra HP5 is also reported to deliver good mileage, and effective dry braking. But a considerable drawback of this tyre is its lackluster grip level on both wet and dry surfaces. Further, drivers might notice a slightly delayed steering response, a below-average tread life and an increased rolling resistance.
In conclusion, both tyres perform admirably under various conditions, but the authentic winner in this comparison test is the Kumho Ecsta HS52. The HS52's consistent performance under different terrains and conditions, coupled with its value for money, makes it a better choice. However, users who experience more wet drives and are looking for better aquaplaning resistance could consider the Maxxis Premitra HP5.
Please note that it is always important to choose a tyre that best suits the specific conditions and driving preferences. For more specific details, please visit each product at Kumho Ecsta HS52 and Maxxis Premitra HP5.
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle2. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Lowcost
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
1. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Very good2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Maxxis Premitra HP5 Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
| Maxxis Premitra HP5 | 36,2 | 28,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Maxxis Premitra HP5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2- | 3 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,7 | 28,6 | |||||
| Maxxis Premitra HP5 | 37,3 | 28,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||