Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Matador Hectorra 5
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Matador (10%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 has a better rating of 69% compared to 10% of the Matador Hectorra 5. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta HS52 was done in 2022, compared to 2023 when was the Matador Hectorra 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Ecsta HS52 and the Hectorra 5 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 75% of Kumho Ecsta HS52 has A wet grip rating, whereas 93% of Matador Hectorra 5 has B rating.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Tests used in comparison (1)
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Autoklub ČR
|
Summer
|
2023 | 205/55 R16 | View |
Performance comparison
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Matador Hectorra 5
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Matador Hectorra 5
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Matador Hectorra 5
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Matador Hectorra 5
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Matador Hectorra 5
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
