In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear). Generally, Goodyear summer tyres are slightly better rated (74%) than Kumho (58%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 has a better rating of 69% compared to 38% of the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta HS52 was done in 2022, compared to 2016 when was the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autoklub ČR 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Ecsta HS52 and the Efficient Grip Performance were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 75% of Kumho Ecsta HS52 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (50%) of the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance also have A wet ratings.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Autoklub ČR
|
Summer
|
2023 | 205/55 R16 | View |
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.