• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Continental EcoContact 6

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Kumho (58%). The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta HS52 was done in 2022, compared to 2020 when was the Continental EcoContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Ecsta HS52 and the EcoContact 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 75% of Kumho Ecsta HS52 has A wet grip rating, whereas 55% of Continental EcoContact 6 has B rating.

# Kumho Ecsta HS52
/69%
Continental EcoContact 6
/0%

Add to comparison

Kumho
Continental
DimensionsR14 - R20 R13 - R24
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

2

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name WetDryRunning costs
Best values in test12+1+
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Rating: Good
222
Continental EcoContact 6
Rating: Satisfactory
2-23+
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test35,727,5
Kumho Ecsta HS5235,7 28,6
Continental EcoContact 636,432,7
Show test details