Segment
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Kumho (58%). The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta HS52 was done in 2022, compared to 2020 when was the Continental EcoContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Ecsta HS52 and the EcoContact 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 75% of Kumho Ecsta HS52 has A wet grip rating, whereas 55% of Continental EcoContact 6 has B rating.
| # | Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Continental EcoContact 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R13 - R24 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Continental EcoContact 6 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,7 | 28,6 | |||||
| Continental EcoContact 6 | 36,4 | 32,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||