Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Continental EcoContact 6
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Kumho (58%). The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta HS52 was done in 2022, compared to 2020 when was the Continental EcoContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Ecsta HS52 and the EcoContact 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 75% of Kumho Ecsta HS52 has A wet grip rating, whereas 55% of Continental EcoContact 6 has B rating.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Tests used in comparison (1)
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Autobild
|
Summer
|
2022 | 215/55 R17 | View |
Performance comparison
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Continental EcoContact 6
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Continental EcoContact 6
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Continental EcoContact 6
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Continental EcoContact 6
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Continental EcoContact 6
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Continental EcoContact 6
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Continental EcoContact 6
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Continental EcoContact 6
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
