Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Upper-middle2. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Yokohama summer tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Kumho (56%). But when it comes to comparing Kumho Ecsta HS51 and Yokohama BluEarth RV-02, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta HS51 was done in 2016, compared to 2020 when was the Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2020 235/55 R17 test, where both the Ecsta HS51 and the BluEarth RV-02 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Kumho Ecsta HS51 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 has A rating. We also know where Ecsta HS51 is made - China.
# | Kumho Ecsta HS51
| Yokohama BluEarth RV-02
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R16 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Upper-middle2. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Upper-middle
1. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Exemplary2. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Satisfactory
1. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Satisfactory2. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Satisfactory
Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,2 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
Kumho Ecsta HS51 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,2 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,5 | ||
Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,6 | 2,1 | 2,0 | 2,6 | ||
Show test details |