Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 4+ Premium2. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Kumho (58%). The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta HS51 was done in 2016, compared to 2023 when was the Michelin Primacy 4+ first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Kumho Ecsta HS51 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Michelin Primacy 4+ has A rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Ecsta HS51 is made in China and Primacy 4+ is made in Spain.
| # | Kumho Ecsta HS51
| Michelin Primacy 4+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Exemplary2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Satisfactory
