• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs. Fulda EcoControl HP2

Comparing the Kumho Ecsta HS51 and the Fulda EcoControl HP2 reveals some key differences between the two summer tyres. Both have been tested by professionals in the industry, ranking in various positions across multiple categories.


The Kumho Ecsta HS51 outperforms the Fulda EcoControl HP2 in several parameters such as aquaplaning, wet handling and wet side guiding. This is supported by results from Autobild and ADAC where it took the 3rd and the 5th position respectively. Notably, this model from Kumho exhibits strong performance in terms of price/value, making it a cost-effective choice for budget-minded consumers. The tyre is manufactured in China and has been replaced by a newer model, Kumho Ecsta HS52. Our rating for this tyre is 78%, indicating a good overall performance.


Shifting focus to the Fulda EcoControl HP2, this tyre shows promising capabilities in resisting aquaplaning, both longitudinally and crosswise. However, it didn't perform as well as the Kumho HS51, ranking 20th and 8th in the Autobild and ADAC tests respectively. The performance in aquaplaning denotes the tyre's ability to maintain control on wet surfaces, a vital safety aspect. This model does not have a newer version to replace it. Our rating for this tyre is 71%.


Despite being the predecessor of the Fulda EcoControl HP2, the EcoControl HP still has a reputable performance. This tyre shows its strength primarily in noise reduction, making it a comfortable choice for long drives.


Verdict: The Kumho HS51 stands out as an overall superior option, based on test results and our ratings. It offers balanced pros, with an impressive ranking in terms of wet handling, aquaplaning resistance and value for price. However, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 is commendable, especially in terms of reducing noise and aquaplaning resistance, still making it a good choice in certain conditions.


Please note that tyre performance may vary significantly based on the conditions they are subjected to, therefore, choose the one best suited to your needs and preferences.


For details on these models and even more options, feel free to check out the manufacturers: Kumho and Fulda.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS51
88%
Kumho
Ecsta HS51
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Wet Braking
Kumho Ecsta HS51
79%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
55%
Wet Handling
Kumho Ecsta HS51
82%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
62%
Best: Firestone Roadhawk (92.0%)
Wet Circle Cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS51
89%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
78%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta HS51
95%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Aquaplaning Cross
Kumho Ecsta HS51
93%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
93%
Dry Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS51
82%
Kumho
Ecsta HS51
Fulda EcoControl HP2
72%
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Dry Braking
Kumho Ecsta HS51
80%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
76%
Dry Handling
Kumho Ecsta HS51
84%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
67%
Best in category: Pirelli Cinturato P7 (97.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Kumho Ecsta HS51
71%
Kumho
Ecsta HS51
Fulda EcoControl HP2
76%
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Noise Exterior
Kumho Ecsta HS51
76%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
75%
Best: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 (90.0%)
Noise Interior
Kumho Ecsta HS51
74%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
81%
Ride Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS51
64%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Best in category: Michelin Primacy 4 (81.5%)
Economy
Kumho Ecsta HS51
72%
Kumho
Ecsta HS51
Fulda EcoControl HP2
78%
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Rolling Resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS51
46%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
71%
Fuel Efficiency
Kumho Ecsta HS51
93%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
87%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS51
78%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
76%
Best in category: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 (94.0%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison