Segment
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Kumho (56%). The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta HS51 was done in 2016, compared to 2020 when was the Continental EcoContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2020 235/55 R17 test, where both the Ecsta HS51 and the EcoContact 6 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Kumho Ecsta HS51 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (52%) of the Continental EcoContact 6 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Ecsta HS51 is made in China and EcoContact 6 is made in Germany.
# | Kumho Ecsta HS51
| Continental EcoContact 6
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R13 - R24 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Upper-middle
1. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Exemplary2. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory
1. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Satisfactory2. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory
Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,2 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
Kumho Ecsta HS51 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,2 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,5 | ||
Continental EcoContact 6 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,0 | 2,3 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
Show test details |