• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs. Continental EcoContact 6

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Kumho (56%). The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta HS51 was done in 2016, compared to 2020 when was the Continental EcoContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2020 235/55 R17 test, where both the Ecsta HS51 and the EcoContact 6 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Kumho Ecsta HS51 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (52%) of the Continental EcoContact 6 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Ecsta HS51 is made in China and EcoContact 6 is made in Germany.

# Kumho Ecsta HS51
/0%
Continental EcoContact 6
/48%

Add to comparison

Kumho
Continental
DimensionsR14 - R18 R13 - R24
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ADAC
Name WetDryNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test2,21,72,11,01,2
Kumho Ecsta HS51
Rating: Satisfactory
2,2 3,02,52,52,5
Continental EcoContact 6
Rating: Satisfactory
2,82,02,31,0 1,2
Show test details