• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage


In our tyre comparison today, we have two summer tyres: the Kumho Ecsta HS51 and the BFGoodrich Advantage. Both tyres have established their presence in the market, proving the reliability of their respective manufacturers Kumho and BFGoodrich.


Moving forward with our detailed comparison, the Kumho Ecsta HS51 is a summer tyre with a rating of 78% on our website. Manufactured in China, it is known for its unique features like superior aquaplaning in both cross and longitudinal directions. Equipping your vehicle with the HS51 enhances wet handling and adds to wet side guide performance. In various tests conducted by Autobild and ADAC, it showed impressive performance in cross aquaplaning, longitudinal aquaplaning, wet circle cornering and exterior noise. Also, it portrayed excellent fuel efficiency. Furthermore, the HS51 offers an attractive price to performance ratio, adding to its overall appeal. This model has been replaced by Kumho Ecsta HS52.


On the other hand, the BFGoodrich Advantage is another summer tyre. It scores a slightly lower rating of 68% compared to its counterpart above. The Advantage comes integrated with features to offer dry handling and fuel efficiency. However, it lacks somewhat in terms of wet grip capabilities. When it was placed under tests conducted by Autobild and ADAC, it emerged with ranking positions of 18 and 9 respectively, indicating a thoroughly average performance.


Conclusively, analysing the shared and individual test results, the Kumho Ecsta HS51 shows a clear edge when it comes to wet road handling. It's ability to combat aquaplaning, boost fuel efficiency and reduce exterior noise puts it on a higher pedestal. The BFGoodrich Advantage, although a fine performer in dry conditions, lags behind in wet weather conditions. Therefore, if you're seeking performance regardless of the weather condition, it may be wise considering the Kumho Ecsta HS51. However, if your main usage largely encompasses dry driving conditions, the Advantage might just be the right fit for you.



Remember to consult your local technician and know your personal driving habits before purchasing tyres. A good tyre can be the difference between a pleasant ride and an unnecessary accident.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS51
88%
Kumho
Ecsta HS51
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Wet Braking
Kumho Ecsta HS51
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
73%
Wet Handling
Kumho Ecsta HS51
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
49%
Best: Firestone Roadhawk (92.0%)
Wet Circle Cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS51
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
78%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta HS51
95%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Aquaplaning Cross
Kumho Ecsta HS51
93%
BFGoodrich Advantage
58%
Dry Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS51
82%
Kumho
Ecsta HS51
BFGoodrich Advantage
86%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Dry Braking
Kumho Ecsta HS51
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Dry Handling
Kumho Ecsta HS51
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
92%
Best in category: Pirelli Cinturato P7 (97.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Kumho Ecsta HS51
71%
Kumho
Ecsta HS51
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Noise Exterior
Kumho Ecsta HS51
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Best: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 (90.0%)
Noise Interior
Kumho Ecsta HS51
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Ride Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS51
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
73%
Best in category: Michelin Primacy 4 (81.5%)
Economy
Kumho Ecsta HS51
72%
Kumho
Ecsta HS51
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Rolling Resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS51
46%
BFGoodrich Advantage
71%
Fuel Efficiency
Kumho Ecsta HS51
93%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS51
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Best in category: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 (94.0%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison