Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Premium2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium3. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium4. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Upper-middle5. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle6. Debica Presto HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Kumho Ecowing ES31 vs. Michelin Primacy 4 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Debica Presto HP2 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
4. Nokian WetProof 5.646. Debica Presto HP2 12.8
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Debica Presto HP2 Exemplary3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary4. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended5. Michelin Primacy 4 Highly recommended6. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Michelin Primacy 4 Recommended3. Nokian WetProof Recommended4. Debica Presto HP2 Satisfactory5. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory6. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Kumho Ecowing ES31 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: Good | 2,5 | 1,7 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,4 | ||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 2,4 | 1,8 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Nokian Wetproof Rating: Satisfactory | 2,1 | 2,2 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,6 | ||
| Debica Presto HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,6 | 2,9 | 1,5 | 2,2 | ||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | 1,8 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
