Segment
1. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Upper-middle2. Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro Lowcost
Comparison: Kumho Ecowing ES31 vs. Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Esa+Tecar). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Esa+Tecar (52%). The first tyre test of Kumho Ecowing ES31 was done in 2022, compared to 2020 when was the Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the Ecowing ES31 and the Spirit Pro were tested.
| # | Kumho Ecowing ES31
| Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro 13.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro Satisfactory2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Kumho Ecowing ES31 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro Rating: Satisfactory | 3,0 | 3,4 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 1,9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
