Segment
1. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Upper-middle2. Debica Presto HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Kumho Ecowing ES31 vs. Debica Presto HP2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica). The first tyre test of Kumho Ecowing ES31 was done in 2022, compared to 2021 when was the Debica Presto HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the Ecowing ES31 and the Presto HP2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 58% of Kumho Ecowing ES31 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (94%) of the Debica Presto HP2 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Kumho Ecowing ES31
| Debica Presto HP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R15 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Debica Presto HP2 12.8
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Presto HP2 Exemplary2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Presto HP2 Satisfactory2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Kumho Ecowing ES31 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Debica Presto HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,6 | 2,9 | 1,5 | 2,2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
