Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium3. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium4. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Upper-middle5. Toyo Proxes Comfort Upper-middle6. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Ecowing ES31 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Toyo Proxes Comfort vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
4. Nokian WetProof 5.64
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary4. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended6. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian WetProof Recommended3. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended4. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory5. Toyo Proxes Comfort Satisfactory6. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Kumho Ecowing ES31 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Good | 2,1 | 1,9 | 2,6 | 2,0 | 1,9 | ||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 2,4 | 1,8 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Toyo Proxes Comfort Rating: Good | 2,4 | 2,5 | 2,4 | 2,5 | 2,5 | ||
| Nokian Wetproof Rating: Satisfactory | 2,1 | 2,2 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,6 | ||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | 1,8 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
