Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Upper-middle3. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle4. Debica Presto HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Kumho Ecowing ES31 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Debica Presto HP2
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WetProof 5.644. Debica Presto HP2 12.8
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Presto HP2 Exemplary2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary3. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended4. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian WetProof Recommended3. Debica Presto HP2 Satisfactory4. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Kumho Ecowing ES31 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 2,4 | 1,8 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Nokian Wetproof Rating: Satisfactory | 2,1 | 2,2 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,6 | ||
| Debica Presto HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,6 | 2,9 | 1,5 | 2,2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
