Segment
1. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Upper-middle2. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Lowcost
Comparison: Kumho Ecowing ES31 vs. Barum Bravuris 5 HM
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (56%) than Barum (29%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecowing ES31 has a better rating of 51% compared to 29% of the Barum Bravuris 5 HM. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecowing ES31 was done in 2022, compared to 2020 when was the Barum Bravuris 5 HM first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the Ecowing ES31 and the Bravuris 5 HM were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 58% of Kumho Ecowing ES31 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Barum Bravuris 5 HM also have B wet ratings.
| # | Kumho Ecowing ES31
| Barum Bravuris 5 HM
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R14 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 26.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory2. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Kumho Ecowing ES31 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Barum Bravuris 5 HM Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,8 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 2,2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
