Comparison: Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 vs. Firestone Roadhawk
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Kumho (58%). The first tyre test of Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Firestone Roadhawk first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the EcowinG ES01 KH27 and the Roadhawk were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 78% of Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 has C wet grip rating, whereas 93% of Firestone Roadhawk has A rating.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Tests used in comparison (1)
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAC
|
Summer
|
2019 | 185/65 R15 | View |
Performance comparison
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
Firestone Roadhawk
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
Firestone Roadhawk
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
Firestone Roadhawk
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
Firestone Roadhawk
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
Firestone Roadhawk
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
