Segment
1. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Crugen Premium KL33 vs. Nokian WetProof
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Kumho (58%). When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 36% of Kumho Crugen Premium KL33 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian WetProof has A rating.
| # | Kumho Crugen Premium KL33
| Nokian WetProof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WetProof 5.64
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WetProof Recommended
