Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Premium2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle3. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Crugen HP91 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Satin vs. Nokian Line SUV
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Highly recommended2. Nokian Line SUV Good3. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line SUV Good2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory3. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Kumho Crugen HP91 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Satin Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
