Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Premium2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Crugen HP91 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Satin
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Vredestein (30%). But when it comes to comparing Kumho Crugen HP91 and Vredestein Ultrac Satin, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 235/50 R18 test, where both the Crugen HP91 and the Ultrac Satin were tested.
| # | Kumho Crugen HP91
| Vredestein Ultrac Satin
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R16 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Highly recommended2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory2. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Still recommended
Offroad
(Overall rating)Grass traction
Gravel traction
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Kumho Crugen HP91 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Satin Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
