Segment
1. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle2. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Crugen HP91 vs. Nokian Line SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Kumho (58%). But when it comes to comparing Kumho Crugen HP91 and Nokian Line SUV, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Kumho Crugen HP91 was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Nokian Line SUV first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Kumho Crugen HP91 has B wet grip rating, whereas 63% of Nokian Line SUV has A rating.
| # | Kumho Crugen HP91
| Nokian Line SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Line SUV Good2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line SUV Good2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory
