Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 3 Premium2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Kumho (58%). But when it comes to comparing Kumho Crugen HP91 and Michelin Primacy 3, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Kumho Crugen HP91 was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Michelin Primacy 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 235/50 R18 test, where both the Crugen HP91 and the Primacy 3 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Kumho Crugen HP91 has B wet grip rating, whereas 91% of Michelin Primacy 3 has A rating.
| # | Kumho Crugen HP91
| Michelin Primacy 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Primacy 3 Premium2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle
1. Michelin Primacy 3 Exemplary2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory
1. Michelin Primacy 3 Recommended2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory
1. Michelin Primacy 3 71 dB
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Kumho Crugen HP91 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Michelin Primacy 3 Rating: Exemplary | 2- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||