Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Premium2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Crugen HP91 vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Kumho (58%). The first tyre test of Kumho Crugen HP91 was done in 2017, compared to 2020 when was the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Kumho Crugen HP91 has B wet grip rating, whereas 77% of Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV has A rating.
| # | Kumho Crugen HP91
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R17 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Exemplary2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory
Offroad
(Overall rating)Gravel traction
Mud traction
1. Kumho Crugen HP91 100%
