Segment 1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV Premium 2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle 3. Gripmax Stature H/T ?
Number of sizes available 1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 93 2. Gripmax Stature H/T 69 3. Kumho Crugen HP91 50
Number of tests 1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 3x 2. Kumho Crugen HP91 2x 3. Gripmax Stature H/T ?
Best position in test 1. Kumho Crugen HP91 5. 2. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 1. 3. Gripmax Stature H/T ?
Worst position in test 1. Kumho Crugen HP91 8. 2. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 2. 3. Gripmax Stature H/T ?
Average position in tests 1. Kumho Crugen HP91 6.5 2. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 1.33 3. Gripmax Stature H/T ?
Year of the last test 1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 2020 2. Kumho Crugen HP91 2018 3. Gripmax Stature H/T ?
Best rating in test 1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV Exemplary 2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory 3. Gripmax Stature H/T ?
Worst rating in test 1. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory 2. Continental SportContact 5 SUV ? 3. Gripmax Stature H/T ?
Wet braking according to EU label 1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV A 2. Kumho Crugen HP91 B 3. Gripmax Stature H/T ?
Offroad(Overall rating) Kumho Crugen HP91 92% Continental SportContact 5 SUV 86% Gripmax Stature H/T 0%
Dry(Overall rating) Continental SportContact 5 SUV 100% Gripmax Stature H/T 86% Kumho Crugen HP91 82%
Costs(Overall rating) Continental SportContact 5 SUV 96% Gripmax Stature H/T 79% Kumho Crugen HP91 64%
Fuel consumption according to EU label 1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV C 2. Kumho Crugen HP91 E 3. Gripmax Stature H/T ?
Comfort(Overall rating) Gripmax Stature H/T 99% Kumho Crugen HP91 96% Continental SportContact 5 SUV 64%
Outside noise accoring to EU label 1. Gripmax Stature H/T ? 2. Kumho Crugen HP91 ? 3. Continental SportContact 5 SUV ?