18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Kumho Crugen HP91 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV vs. Continental SportContact 5 SUV

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Kumho Crugen HP91 /0%	General Tire Grabber GT Plus /43%	Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV /93%	Continental SportContact 5 SUV /0%

Dimensions	R16 - R22	R15 - R23	R17 - R23	R18 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Premium

2. Continental SportContact 5 SUV Premium

3. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 137

2. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 93

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64

4. Kumho Crugen HP91 50

Number of tests

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 7x

2. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 3x

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2x

4. Kumho Crugen HP91 2x

Best position in test

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 1.

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 1.

3. Kumho Crugen HP91 5.

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

Worst position in test

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 2.

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 6.

3. Kumho Crugen HP91 8.

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

Average position in tests

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 1.33

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 2.43

3. Kumho Crugen HP91 6.5

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9

Year of the last test

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 2025

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2023

3. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 2020

4. Kumho Crugen HP91 2018

Best rating in test

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV Exemplary

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Exemplary

3. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Good

2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactory

4. Continental SportContact 5 SUV ?

Wet

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Pilot Sport 4 SUV

91%

Continental
SportContact 5 SUV

87%

Kumho
Crugen HP91

86%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

67%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 92%

2. Kumho Crugen HP91 75%

3. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 66%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64%

Wet braking

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 98%

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 90%

3. Kumho Crugen HP91 88%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 80%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Kumho Crugen HP91 93%

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 94%

3. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 91%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 68%

Wet circle cornering

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 91%

2. Kumho Crugen HP91 83%

3. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 79%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 62%

Wet handling

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 100%

2. Kumho Crugen HP91 92%

3. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 87%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 61%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV A

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV A

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus A

4. Kumho Crugen HP91 B

Offroad

(Overall rating)

Kumho
Crugen HP91

92%

Continental
SportContact 5 SUV

86%

Michelin
Pilot Sport 4 SUV

80%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

74%

Grass traction

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 85%

2. Kumho Crugen HP91 83%

3. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 79%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64%

Gravel traction

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 92%

2. Kumho Crugen HP91 88%

3. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 87%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 80%

Mud traction

1. Kumho Crugen HP91 100%

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 80%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 73%

4. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 68%

Sand traction

1. Kumho Crugen HP91 96%

2. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 91%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 83%

4. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 72%

Handling on gravel

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 100%

2. Kumho Crugen HP91 94%

3. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 77%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 70%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
SportContact 5 SUV

100%

Michelin
Pilot Sport 4 SUV

88%

Kumho
Crugen HP91

82%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

64%

Dry braking

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 100%

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 84%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 74%

4. Kumho Crugen HP91 69%

Dry handling

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 99%

2. Kumho Crugen HP91 95%

3. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 91%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 53%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Kumho
Crugen HP91

96%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

72%

Michelin
Pilot Sport 4 SUV

71%

Continental
SportContact 5 SUV

64%

Exterior noise

1. Kumho Crugen HP91 96%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 72%

3. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 71%

4. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 64%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 72 dB

2. Kumho Crugen HP91 ?

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus ?

4. Continental SportContact 5 SUV ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
SportContact 5 SUV

96%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

88%

Michelin
Pilot Sport 4 SUV

66%

Kumho
Crugen HP91

64%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 96%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 88%

3. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 66%

4. Kumho Crugen HP91 64%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV C

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus C

3. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV C

4. Kumho Crugen HP91 E

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Kumho Crugen HP91 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV vs. Continental SportContact 5 SUV

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands